Thursday, June 19, 2008
Buying art can be a tricky proposition A before and after story
Be sure to read this till the very end! This is truly unbelievable!
The first part
AP-The guy who bought it at an auction house for 4.5 million, that's who! Apparently the auction house thought the painting to be a knock-off and valued the painting at a mere $3100. A British buyer took his chances paying 1500 times the valued sum! This guy may sound like a sucker until you find out that after being reevaluated, the painting was not a knock-off or painted by a student as originally though but rather a self portrait. The painting is now valued at about 40 million.
The 9 1/2-inch-by-6 1/2-inch painting will hang in the Rembrandt House Museum in Amsterdam through June 29, on loan from the anonymous Briton who bought it at the auction by Moore, Allen and Innocent in Gloucestershire and had it cleaned and examined by British experts.
Art expert Jan Six from another auction house, Sotheby's, declined to put a new value on the painting. But he said the sale itself was a rare opportunity, as Rembrandt's works come on the market only once every few years.
"A self-portrait by Rembrandt, that's absolutely unique — not in my lifetime," Six said.
Rembrandt made the self-portrait about 1628, when he was in his early 20s and still in his hometown, Leiden. Already he was earning his reputation as an artist, and experimenting with a mirror and his own face to capture expressions.
"It has an incredible presence," said Ernst van de Wetering, head of the Rembrandt Research Project and an authority on the Dutch master. "The light has the most natural quality of light you can think of. ... and I love the naturalness of the laughing."
The painting previously had been in the hands of an English family for more than 100 years, according to Moore, Allen and Innocent. Some had assumed it to be by one of Rembrandt's students or a Rembrandt imitator.
The conclusion
Rembrandt Thought Fake Worth Millions
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (June 19) - The auction house thought the portrait was a 17th century Rembrandt knockoff, and valued it at just $3,100. But the British buyer who paid about 1,500 times more than that apparently knew what he was doing.
Experts have confirmed "Rembrandt Laughing" - bought for a bargain price of $4.5 million at an English auction house in October - is a self-portrait by the Dutch master himself, depicted with his head tilted back in easygoing laughter.
'Rembrandt Laughing,' a 1628 self-portrait by the Dutch master, was appraised at $3,100 as a knockoff for an October auction. An anonymous Brit bought it for $4.5 million. Turns out it was a good call: Now authenticated, the painting has an estimated worth of $30 million to $40 million.
William Noortman from Noortman Master Paintings, specializing in Dutch and Flemish masters, said it's worth $30 million to $40 million, adding: "I'm very surprised it didn't make more at auction."
The 9 1/2-inch-by-6 1/2-inch painting will hang in the Rembrandt House Museum in Amsterdam through June 29, on loan from the anonymous Briton who bought it at the auction by Moore, Allen and Innocent in Gloucestershire and had it cleaned and examined by British experts.
Art expert Jan Six from another auction house, Sotheby's, declined to put a new value on the painting. But he said the sale itself was a rare opportunity, as Rembrandt's works come on the market only once every few years.
"A self-portrait by Rembrandt, that's absolutely unique - not in my lifetime," Six said.
Rembrandt made the self-portrait about 1628, when he was in his early 20s and still in his hometown, Leiden. Already he was earning his reputation as an artist, and experimenting with a mirror and his own face to capture expressions.
"It has an incredible presence," said Ernst van de Wetering, head of the Rembrandt Research Project and an authority on the Dutch master. "The light has the most natural quality of light you can think of. ... and I love the naturalness of the laughing."
The painting previously had been in the hands of an English family for more than 100 years, according to Moore, Allen and Innocent. Some had assumed it to be by one of Rembrandt's students or a Rembrandt imitator.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment